Owner complaints
215NHTSA recordsUSED VEHICLE RESEARCH
2021 Subaru Forester
Research the 2021 Subaru Forester using available NHTSA owner complaints, safety recalls, manufacturer communications, defect investigations, and CarIQ data-coverage analysis.
DATA CONFIDENCE: LimitedSubaru Forester2021 · RESEARCH CATALOG
Recall campaigns
UnavailableYear, make and model lookupManufacturer communications
0Matched NHTSA recordsInvestigations
0Matched NHTSA recordsSUBJECTIVE OWNER FEEDBACK
OWNER EXPERIENCE
What it is like to live with the vehicle—kept clearly separate from official NHTSA evidence.
THE FIRST USEFUL PERSPECTIVE COULD BE YOURS
No approved owner experiences yet.
Contributions are collected carefully and only appear here after moderation. No placeholders, sample testimonials, or invented sentiment.OWNED THIS CAR?
Help the next buyer understand the real ownership experience.
Share what you liked, what could be better, and whether you would choose it again. Every contribution is moderated before publication.NHTSA owner complaint records remain part of Official Vehicle Data. Subjective review contributions remain in Owner Experience. One does not validate or prove the other. Read the methodology.
EVIDENCE, NOT A SCORE
WHAT THIS DATA CAN TELL YOU ABOUT RELIABILITY
Official records can provide useful research context, but each source has a different meaning. Complaint counts are not failure rates; recalls are formal safety campaigns; manufacturer communications are technical or service documentation; and investigations reflect formal NHTSA activity. Data Confidence measures evidence availability, not vehicle quality. CarIQ does not publish a composite Reliability Score.
Available evidence summary: 215 NHTSA owner complaint records; safety recall campaigns are currently unavailable; 0 manufacturer communications; 0 applicable NHTSA defect investigations.
EVIDENCE AVAILABILITY — NOT VEHICLE RELIABILITY
DATA CONFIDENCE
LimitedData Confidence measures how much usable evidence CarIQ has for this vehicle. It does not measure how reliable the vehicle is.
Why this rating?
- Owner complaint data
- Available
- Manufacturer communications
- Available
- Recall data
- Unavailable
- Investigation data
- Available
- Production denominator
- Unavailable
- Complaint component completeness
- 100%
- Mileage completeness
- 0%
- Incident-date completeness
- 100%
DESCRIPTIVE ANALYTICS
DATA INSIGHTS
Derived from official NHTSA source records. These statistics are descriptive and are not a reliability score.
- Complaint records analyzed
- 215 NHTSA complaints
- Most reported component
- Visibility/wiper 35% of categorized complaint records
- Top-three component concentration
- 67% Records mentioning at least one top-three component
- Median reported incident mileage
- Not available from current source 0 valid mileage observations
- Recall campaigns
- Unavailable NHTSA recalls
- Most recent recall report
- Not available NHTSA recalls
- Manufacturer communications
- 0 NHTSA manufacturer communications
- Most documented component
- Not available NHTSA manufacturer communications
- Top-three communication concentration
- Not available Share of categorized manufacturer communications
SOURCE COMPLETENESS
DATA QUALITY
- Complaint records analyzed
- 215
- Component classification available
- 100%
- Incident date available
- 100%
- Mileage available
- 0%
- Structured outcome fields available
- 100%
Completeness describes fields present in the retrieved complaint records. It is not a data-quality grade or a vehicle assessment.
Learn about CarIQ methodologyPRODUCTION-ADJUSTED DESCRIPTIVE METRIC
NORMALIZED COMPLAINT CONTEXT
Production-normalized complaint data is not currently available for this vehicle.
This metric compares the number of NHTSA owner complaint records retrieved by CarIQ with NHTSA-reported production volume for the corresponding vehicle population.
It is not a vehicle failure rate. Complaint reporting behavior, vehicle age, time on the road, production definitions, and other factors can affect the result.
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Early Warning Reporting, Light Vehicle Production Data. Read the methodology.
OFFICIAL NHTSA OWNER COMPLAINT DATA
PROBLEMS REPORTED IN NHTSA RECORDS
CarIQ groups available NHTSA owner complaint records for the 2021 Subaru Forester by vehicle system to make recurring documentation easier to research. Most represented complaint categories describe the retrieved records—not failure frequency.
MOST REPRESENTED COMPLAINT CATEGORIES
A complaint may list more than one component and therefore contribute to multiple categories. Percentages show the share of categorized complaint records that mention each component—not the percentage of vehicles affected. Category percentages may overlap.
INCIDENT REPORTS BY YEAR
Grouped from complaint records with a valid incident date.
RECENT OWNER COMPLAINTS
Power Train · Electrical System · Engine
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11774980Read complaint narrative
When coming to a stop, the auto start/stop system shuts the engine off and it fails to restart. All dashboard warning lights illuminate. The vehicle must be shifted to Park and restarted manually with the start button. The component that failed is the auto start/stop system; the exact cause is UNKNOWN. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. This put safety at risk because the vehicle was left immobile in live traffic at stops until it could be restarted. There were no warning lamps or symptoms before the failure; the warning lights come on when the failure occurs. The vehicle was inspected by Gillman Subaru Southwest on October 229, 2026, and the dealer stated the battery performance was bad and in critical condition.
Engine
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11774244Read complaint narrative
Component Failed & Inspection Availability: The vehicle suffered a sudden, catastrophic mechanical engine block failure at 74,000 miles. The dealership teardown confirmed a failed/spun lifter bearing and a fractured connecting rod cap, requiring a complete engine replacement. This sudden oil pressure failure/blockage occurred while the engine oil pan was verified completely full. This sudden mechanical failure is directly consistent with severe localized thermal breakdown from a failing Thermo Control Valve (TCV)—a component subject to Subaru Warranty Extension WMM23—or loose factory RTV silicone debris clogging the oil galleries. The failed components, including the engine block, rod cap, and TCV, have been retained by the owner and are fully available for inspection upon request. Safety Risk: The engine failed catastrophically and seized instantaneously while driving at highway speeds, causing a sudden and total loss of motive power. This created an immediate hazard as the vehicle rapidly decelerated in active traffic without warning, blinding drivers behind me and stripping the vehicle of power steering assist. This forced a dangerous maneuver to navigate the disabled vehicle through highway traffic to the shoulder, significantly risking a severe rear-end collision. Dealer Confirmation & Inspection Status: The problem and point of failure were officially confirmed and documented via a physical engine teardown conducted by a certified Subaru dealership service center. Subaru of America Corporate Advocacy was notified under Case Number 260818-1500487 but denied coverage. The components have not been inspected by the police or insurance representatives, but they remain preserved as physical evidence. Warning Lamps & Symptoms: There were no warning lamps, check engine lights, low-oil indicators, or abnormal electronic codes prior to the instantaneous mechanical failure. The vehicle had been professionally serviced and oil-changed just 3,800 miles prior to the breakdo
Power Train
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11774223Read complaint narrative
The contact owns a 2021 Subaru Forester. The contact stated that while driving and accelerating from a stop, the vehicle started bucking and hesitating. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer to be diagnosed, and it was determined that the transmission control valve body was inoperable and needed to be replaced. The transmission control valve body was replaced and the vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the repair was not covered under an extended warranty associated with the failure. The failure mileage was 66,902.
Electrical System · Engine
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11773516Read complaint narrative
I was stopped at a red light. When the light changed to green I put my foot on the gas and the car totally stalled out. There were no lights, fans or radio on just total silence. I tried to restart the car putting it is park and depressing the brake while pushing the start button and nothing. It didn't even try to turn over. silent, dead. I tried several times with no luck. I got out of the car to signal to the bus and row of cars behind me to pass me. I got back into the car and tried to start it again and this time it started. I drove immediately to the mechanic near my house. They couldn't see what was going on without me leaving the car next week. The battery had been replaced 6 months ago. This was a busy intersection and I was worried about getting out of the car but I had no choice.
Structure
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11772587Read complaint narrative
There’s two brackets that are at the top of the tailgate, and also at the top of the body where they meet to match up, The bracket on the right sits flush, the bracket on the left since indented about a 1/4” give or take. Because it’s painted by the factory, there’s no cracks around the bracket and the paint, meaning it happened at the factory. I’ve looked at other cars that are in that same model year bracket between 2018 and 2025, and they’re all variations of the Subaru Forrester. Didn’t matter if a sport or limited any of that. They all have the same indented left hand bracket that is causing mold on the interior of the car, some worse than others, and I spoke to the people that own the cars, the ones that are parked in a garage or car covered, they have less mold, the people that parked their cars outside have more mold. But they all have the same bracket on the left-hand side that is screwed up. I’m attaching photos to show the amount of mold damage we have taken, and so much more.
Unknown or Other
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11770474Read complaint narrative
Driver side rear window spontaneously failed while driving on the highway. Passenger experienced cuts due to glass fragments
Power Train
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11769116Read complaint narrative
The transmission very suddenly (perfectly fine one day, bad the next) developed a severe transmission slip. Like getting rear ended feeling transmission slip. Dealership quotes the CVT control valve body.
Engine · Fuel/propulsion System
Owner-submitted NHTSA complaint · ODI 11768776Read complaint narrative
On two separate occasions, less than one year apart after Subaru Service replaced my battery with a “larger” battery without my knowledge my vehicle suffered sudden, catastrophic electrical failure while moving in active highway traffic, causing an immediate loss of propulsion and creating a life-threatening safety hazard. This has happened two times the second time less than a year after the “larger” battery replacement. This car has less than 50,000 miles on it and has a perfect service record all done at AutoNation Subaru Carlsbad. We refuse to drive this car, even though it has been serviced and a new battery has, yet again, been installed. We have no faith in this car and are not willing to put ourselves in a life-threatening situation again. We also do not feel comfortable selling this car, even though we have received many above market offers. We do not feel that we can sell this car in good conscience to an unknowing next victim. It is unsafe to drive and can lose power at any moment while driving without any explanation given from Subaru. The first battery failure occurred prematurely in August 2025. Asked repeatedly why a car battery would fail while driving? Could not get a straight answer except that someone finally said it could possibly be from the auto stop start system The new larger battery failed less than one year later in August 2026, so it didn’t even last a year and it was larger. The service department at AutoNation Carlsbad told me my car passed all the test and I have nothing to worry about. This goes against any common sense. How could this happen 2 times where no issue has been disclosed. Both situations were extremely traumatic and dangerous and I feel lucky that I was able to come out of it. I’m not sure the next time would be the same. We are not able to drive this car because common sense tells us there is a bigger issue going on. So far we’ve communicated with Subaru of America and were denied California Lemon law without reason.
NHTSA complaints are reports submitted by vehicle owners and other consumers. Complaint counts do not represent the percentage of vehicles affected and do not by themselves establish that a safety defect exists.
A higher complaint count can partly reflect how many vehicles were sold, vehicle age, and other factors. CarIQ does not yet normalize complaint counts by vehicles sold.
Data provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). This site is not endorsed by NHTSA.
OFFICIAL NHTSA SAFETY RECALL DATA
SAFETY RECALLS
Recall data is temporarily unavailable. Please check again later or verify directly with NHTSA.
Recall results shown here are based on year, make, and model. A specific vehicle may or may not be affected. Check the vehicle's VIN with NHTSA to confirm open recalls before purchasing. Data provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
OFFICIAL NHTSA MANUFACTURER COMMUNICATION DATA
MANUFACTURER COMMUNICATIONS
No NHTSA manufacturer communication records were returned for this year, make, and model.
Manufacturer communications include service bulletins and other technical information submitted by manufacturers to NHTSA. The existence or number of communications does not establish how often a condition occurs or whether an individual vehicle will experience it.
Some manufacturers may issue more detailed service documentation than others, so communication counts should not be used alone to compare vehicle reliability.
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration manufacturer communicationsNATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
NHTSA DEFECT INVESTIGATIONS
No applicable NHTSA defect investigation records were returned for this year, make, and model.
NHTSA investigations evaluate potential motor-vehicle safety defects. The existence of an investigation does not by itself establish that a safety defect exists, and the absence of an investigation does not establish that a vehicle is problem-free.
Open and closed describe NHTSA's process status, not a CarIQ reliability judgment.
View official NHTSA investigation data ↗DESCRIPTIVE SOURCE OVERLAP
CROSS-SOURCE VEHICLE DATA
CarIQ compares categories appearing across independent NHTSA datasets. Overlap can help identify areas with more available documentation, but it does not establish defect frequency or prove that an individual vehicle will experience a problem.
| Component | Owner complaints | Manufacturer communications | Recall campaigns | NHTSA investigations | Official sources containing records |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visibility/wiper | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Unknown or Other | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Engine | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Electrical System | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Forward Collision Avoidance | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Power Train | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Visibility | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Lane Departure | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
| Fuel/propulsion System | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 of 4 |
Displayed first by the number of source categories containing the component, then by owner complaint count, then alphabetically. This is a presentation rule, not a vehicle ranking. Complaint reports, manufacturer communications, recalls, and investigations describe different events and are never added into a combined total.
- complaint
- Available
- communication
- Available
- recall
- Unavailable
- investigation
- Available
- production
- Unavailable
COMMON RESEARCH QUESTIONS
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 2021 SUBARU FORESTER
Is the 2021 Subaru Forester reliable?
CarIQ does not currently assign a reliability score to the 2021 Subaru Forester. Available evidence is shown as separate official-source records with a Data Confidence classification of Limited.
What problems are reported for the 2021 Subaru Forester?
215 NHTSA owner complaint records. When complaint data is available, the page groups records by the NHTSA component categories they identify without treating those categories as verified failure rates.
Are there recalls for the 2021 Subaru Forester?
safety recall campaigns are currently unavailable. Year, make, and model results do not confirm whether a specific VIN is affected or whether a remedy has been completed.
USED-CAR CANDIDATE RESEARCH
Considering buying a 2021 Subaru Forester?
Enter the mileage and asking price to review Is This A Good Car?'s available evidence for the specific candidate. No buy/no-buy or pricing judgment is produced. Open the full research tool.